INSUS reconciles source-level methane estimates with site-level measurements, helps explain the difference and maintains the evidence trail for reporting and third-party verification. Emissions specialists remain responsible for interpretation.
01
Reconcile source inventory with site-level measurement.
02
Keep discrepancies, uncertainty and evidence visible.
03
Advisory only. No Level 5 guarantee or legal determination.
The problem
Methane reporting can start with activity data and emission factors. Level 5 introduces a harder requirement: compare what the source inventory says with what site-level measurement shows, then account for why the two do not agree. The challenge is maintaining that comparison across operations, measurement campaigns and verification evidence, rather than assembling it as a periodic reporting exercise.
The shift
The hard part is not simply collecting more methane data. It is repeatedly accounting for why two valid measurement approaches disagree, stating the uncertainty and maintaining evidence that can withstand specialist and third-party review.
Today
With INSUS
How it works
Delivered through ExpertFlow AI as document intelligence over inventory, measurement and operations records. It organizes the reconciliation evidence. It does not replace physical measurement or guarantee OGMP Level 5.
Connect
Connect source-level inventories, equipment records, activity data, venting and flaring records, LDAR results, site-level or aerial measurement results, SCADA and historian data, maintenance records and applicable OGMP and regulatory documentation.
Understand
Align inventory and measurement results in time and space, then relate them to the asset's actual operating state, so comparable measurements are distinguished from campaigns influenced by unusual conditions.
Predict
Model expected source-level emissions for the operating state being observed, creating a reference against which measured site-level emissions and potential unexplained differences can be evaluated.
Identify
Compare bottom-up and top-down results, propagate uncertainty, attribute differences to identified sources or operating events where evidence supports it, and flag gaps that require further investigation.
Verify
Track how the unexplained fraction changes over successive campaigns. Feed specialist and verifier findings back into the workflow and identify where additional measurement or LDAR effort could reduce remaining uncertainty.
Getting started
For upstream operators preparing OGMP 2.0 Level 5-style reconciliation and related methane MRV evidence. Delivered through ExpertFlow AI as document intelligence. Expert Services can help with discovery and validation. It does not replace physical measurement services.
Related for upstream
Methane reconciliation sits beside virtual flow metering and gas lift allocation that provide operating context on the same asset.
OGMP 2.0 Level 5 requires comparing source-level methane inventories with site-level measurement and explaining the difference. This use case supports that reconciliation and keeps the evidence trail ready for specialist and third-party review.
Source-level methane inventory, measurement campaign results, operational and historian data covering measurement periods, LDAR findings, repair records and relevant OGMP and regulatory documentation. No new measurement hardware from INSUS.
No. Site-level measurement may require instruments, aircraft, drones, satellites or other services the operator commissions. Software alone does not create the physical measurement required for Level 5-style reconciliation.
No. It supports reconciliation, documentation and evidence preparation. Reporting-level assessments and verification remain the responsibility of the relevant framework, specialists and third parties.
Through ExpertFlow AI as document intelligence. Expert Services can support discovery, evidence structuring and validation with your emissions team.
No. It can retrieve and organise applicable regulation and OGMP guidance with source references, but regulatory interpretation and compliance decisions remain with qualified professionals.
The system cannot attribute emissions not covered by available data. Non-operated assets depend on partner data quality. Regulatory requirements and guidance can evolve. Physical methane measurement remains outside INSUS scope.
Upstream · Methane MRV
Take one completed methane measurement campaign and reconcile it properly. See how much of the difference can be explained, where uncertainty remains and what evidence would make the next verification cycle stronger.
